Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bøsdalafossur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Bøsdalafossur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced stub with large overlap with Sørvágsvatn. ᗞᗴᖇᑭᗅᒪᗴᖇᎢ (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 08:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 08:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion, see WP:RUBBISH; what counts is the existence of sources, see WP:NEXIST. Being a stub is not a reson for deletion either, see WP:IMPATIENT. The so-called "overlap with Sørvágsvatn" is obscure to me, they are distinct natural features, and per WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. A few references to book sources have been added. — Sam Sailor 22:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep but improve: "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion but you can by adding refs to the article. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 17:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep AFD is not cleanup. And it has sources now. Smartyllama (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.