Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bühnenkunst Theatre Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  | Talk 13:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Bühnenkunst Theatre Company

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable organization. Article contains only primary sources. Only non-trivial mention of the company in ghits is a book, which appears to be self-published and not well-distributed. Fails WP:V. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete No RS, no significant coverage Lets  drink  Tea  15:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't read German, but could someone who does take a look at these:  .  I'm not even sure if they're about the right theater, but if so, they might be good sources. Cool3 (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Pressemitteilung.ws is a site for press releases (which can be self-submitted, as this one is). Potsdam-abc.de is a website of the University of Potsdam - the page is a blurb about how an alumni of the University founded the company. I don't read German, but Google translate helped. --AbsolutDan (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, I should have thought of Google translate myself. Based on the google translation, it would appear that these are not sufficient to establish notability, so I'm now leaning towards delete. Cool3 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - selfpromotion of nn theatre company (not one independent reliable source). (Article created by User:Jliebe; founder is given as "Janek Liebetruth"). Rd232 talk 02:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ORG and general precedent that groups local in scope don't get articles outside of truly extraordinary circumstance. Article is also very obviously spam/self-promotion: "remain close to our company", etc. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.