Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B̤ē


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein. North America1000 06:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

B̤ē

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There's no claim of notability and the article relies of self-published sources. None of these should exist; if the content was useful it should be at Saraiki alphabet or Arabic script in Unicode but not in standalone articles. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also additional letters and insufficiently sources with no claim of notability.:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Probably more useful to merge/redirect to Voiced bilabial implosive, and similarly for other articles. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Voiced bilabial implosive and the rest are phonetic articles and it's not customary to load these with any sort of orthographic details. If a merge is to be done I'm not sure I see a good target. The letters are used in more than one language orthography so redirecting to an article about one of the alphabet rather than the other isn't appropriate. A target like Arabic script in Unicode is both too general (all of the Arabic scripts) and too specific (only with regard to Unicode) to contain any meaningful content about individual letters. If there's problem with the current sources, then it's a trivial task to find more reliable ones.  – Uanfala 23:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The phonetics articles typically include a list of examples with transcriptions in the appropriate script, although it would be confusing to people who can't read Arabic. There are similar articles with Arabic-character titles such as ڄ and ݨ but I don't know if moving to ٻ is in order (currently that redirects here). --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  06:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  08:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.