Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-17 Flying Fortress No. 42-29532 Memorial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

B-17 Flying Fortress No. 42-29532 Memorial

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Training crashes happened all the time during WW2; this one was no different. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and WP:NOTMEMORIAL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftify There is a slim chance the park is somehow notable, which is the only reason I include draftify as an option. Otherwise doesn't meet GNG. Intothatdarkness 18:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTMEMORIAL is not relevant here; that applies when Wikipedia itself is being used as a memorial. As a physical memorial and memorial park, this falls under WP:NBUILDING: Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. Since this only has local significance, it does not pass the bar. I suggest that an entry be added to List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (1943–1944).  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.