Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-Con

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:10, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

B-Con
an obvious vanity page... WB 03:18, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) Don't delete. This page was created for a little fun. Read for more information. Not a personal attack.
 * Delete vanity. -- Jonel | Speak 03:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. Pburka 03:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete trolls make bad article subjects. Also, I haven't checked the person in question, but it could be an attack on a forum moderator. - Mgm|(talk) 08:32, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious vanity. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:11, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for vanity and the lack of notability. Nestea 14:15, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Fun isn't a good criterion for including something in an encyclopedia. - Mgm|(talk) 21:33, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * Speed Delete - It's not even an article, it makes no real claims besides "B-con is a poo face". MPS 17:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, absolutely nothing to warrant inclusion here. --Etacar11 19:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - This is actually quite notable, especially once the term :bcon: takes off, and people will want to know it's origin. Markisdee 02:13, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Markisdee, you registered after the VfD... Plus, you're a member of . Certainly :bcon: will not "take off." User page is enough if anyone is questioning about his origin. Wikipedia is really not a place to have everyone's personal information. WB 05:56, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.