Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-switch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

B-switch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Topic is non-notable, purely original research. A kind of a claim to notability had been removed, correctly, by the second editor as "POV and 'rumors.'" I tried to look for a CSD-option, but could not find it; if I overlooked something that does allow this to be speedied, by all means act upon your knowledge. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete. Does not look notable, especially since the B-switch was created in early 2009.  Sarwicked (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: agreed. This looks like original research WP:OR and a neologism. JamesBurns (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as completely unverifiable in addition to already noted concerns. -- Whpq (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.