Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.N.F (J-Com man) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

B.N.F (J-Com man)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A Japanese stock trader who made a mistake and got interviewed? Even if sources for these interviews could be located and translated, it'd be textbook WP:BLP1E. Tarc (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. 1st AfD was a bit of a joke IMO, and nothing has happened since then. Tarc (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a clear cut case of Biographies of living persons. Information on the event itself already covered at Mizuho Securities. — Satori Son 16:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a classic BLP1E case. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. Bonewah (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: The ja.wiki article has an unusually large number of references -- these should be evaluated before deciding anything. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * As noted above sourcing is not the point of contention. Apart from this blip, this is a low-profile individual. Tarc (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The event is clearly notable; this individual person is not. — Satori Son 13:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't being clear -- I meant, the ja.wiki references need to be checked for coverage outside this one event. If so, then this would be a keep. If not, then this would be a cover-the-event-not-the-person situation, with a redirect (after selectively merging as needed) being the appropriate outcome. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 01:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.