Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.R. Guest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep(non-admin closure) the article is now well cited. Icewedge (talk) 20:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

B.R. Guest

 * – (View AfD)

15 days since I posted a notability notice. No change and no additional references. -- Kickstart70 - T - C 16:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I did [this Google News archive search] and found several references. I added some to the article, and notability is now clearly demonstrated. I think this is why editors should do a Google News archive search on articles before nominating them for deletion. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep After Eastmain's insert of third-party refs, notability is established. Raven1977 (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep now demonstrated as notable, nice job Eastmain. Paxse (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.