Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Vijayalakshmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

B. Vijayalakshmi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

did not meet WP:PROF. Iundweartand theh uman interest of her personal story, but this is an encyclopedia, and devoted to NPOV.  DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: article had issues with promotional tone, which I've tried to tamp down. However, I think notability is established, as her biography was published in Lilavati's Daughters, published by the Indian Academy of Sciences. I will continue looking for other sources to shore up claims of notability, but feel that article is up-to-scratch with GNG. Enwebb (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: She is noted at least in India for her efforts in her career despite her struggle with cancer as the sources say, and has a documentary made about her by a noted media personality. I checked for more reliable sources, even in regional languages, but there are almost none other than the ones already in use. I feel the existing sources suffice to establish her notability. Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 06:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: As per Enwebb's edits, I feel the NPOV has been improved. TheGreatConsultingDetective (talk) 09:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.