Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B1079 road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Athaenara (talk | contribs | block) deleted "B1079 road" ‎ (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: ref Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B1079 road.) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

B1079 road

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable, run-of-the-mill B road. No assertion of notability is made. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with nominator. This also is consistent with an old centralised discussion. Zangar (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ? Oh, B roads should not be created. That means I don't mind deletion (I am the author). Wilbysuffolk   talk  16:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability is minimal Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * G7 speedy per Wilbysuffolk above.— S Marshall T/C 18:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge relevant information to the road's entry in B roads in Zone 1 of the Great Britain numbering scheme, then delete. PWilkinson (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not merge. (Merge and delete is not a viable option AFAIK with our licensing schema anyhow.)   coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You can technically do it two ways: (1) Place a list of authors of the merged content on the target article's talk page, or (2) If there are only a few, use a dummy edit, as was done here. The fact that it can technically be done doesn't necessarily make it a good idea, though, and if content is merged, best practice is to keep the history beneath a redirect unless there's some pressing reason for deletion.— S Marshall T/C 21:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

It has been speedyed by me. Wilbysuffolk  talk  08:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.