Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B683 road

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

B683 road
While major highways are encyclopedic, B roads are not. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 11:46, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. User:SPUI is entirely aware of the discussion around whether or not all B roads are notable, and is making a WP:POINT. Proto t c 11:51, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This road is entirely unremarkable. It's not the longest nor the shortest of its kind, it doesn't appear to be particularly dangerous and it's not a famous location. Just the fact it's there is not enough to include it. - Mgm|(talk) 12:28, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all B roads. --SPUI (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. We are in the middle of a debate over all B roads. Currently, there are 17 votes for delete all, 2 for keep all, and (I think) 11 for keep only notable, listify rest. Sdedeo 15:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no vote, only a "discussion". --SPUI (talk) 16:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per the consensus on B-roads. Pilatus 15:27, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no consensus on B roads, so I have struck out the lies. --SPUI (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pilatus Tonywalton | Talk 15:42, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of B roads in Great Britain then delete. &mdash; RJH 16:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, preferably after info is added to List of B roads in Great Britain. Gazpacho 16:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete minor uninteresting road. One of thousands. --TimPope 16:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - in my opinion there is a rough consensus, though certainly not unanimity, in the discussion on B-roads. Regardless of whether or not consensus exists, for someone heavily involved in that discussion to create new B-road stubs while that discussion is ongoing is unwise, and borders on disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 17:09, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Keep any road that makes a claim to notability, unlike this one. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - forget WP:POINT, this borders on trolling. the wub  "?/!"  20:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-08-23 T 21:22:41 Z
 * Delete, there really isn't anything interesting, notable, encyclopedic or informative about a B road. The discussion appears to have a rough consensus against B-roads too, and I question the wisdom, if not the reason, of creating such articles with that borne in mind. -Splash 22:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: not notable. Jonathunder 22:28, 2005 August 23 (UTC)
 * Delete'. No claim to notability. Not notable just by being. Tear up the tarmack and return the fields of bytes to the clean green way nature intended. Sabine's Sunbird 01:39, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, verifiable. Notability is not a criterion for deletion.  JYolkowski // talk 01:41, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless, unencyclopedic, and trivial roadcruft substub, not to mention disruption to make a point. --Calton | Talk 01:47, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. I humbly submit that author and nominator are equally guilty of breaching WP:POINT.  -- Visviva 04:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 05:54, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions.  -- Visviva 12:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:POINT, stop cluttering up Wiki with roadcruft. If the B road is notable, it'll have an actual name, I have a feeling that the author has never actually seen a B road.  - Hahnchen 00:07, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this is as ridiculous as that 56th street...  Grue   19:54, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.