Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAE Tungurahua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

BAE Tungurahua

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:V. The only source is an incomplete citation to a book that doesn't seem to exist. Searching finds no other confirmation; suspected hoax created by a WP:SPA whose only edits were to create this article an add a few links to it. MB 04:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Ecuador. MB 04:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The book in question DOES seem to exist, see Worldcat:, however it appears to be part of a series on the provinces of Ecuador, so this story, even if true, would seem to be a minor episode rather than any kind of focus. No other references that I can find, so agree that it fails WP:V, even if it isn't a hoax. PianoDan (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The (now deleted) description of the boow which is the sole ref a @excellent' in the ref (lord have mercy) sets bells ringing. As does the complete absence of anything about the ship, rather than the name. If it existed their would surely be something online: I find a modern tugboat and a 1920s torpedo boat. Failing a reliable source such as Jane's, off with its head.TheLongTone (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, Not meets GNG. Jawad Haqbeen (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.