Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAT!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

BAT!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I found no significant coverage per WP:BAND. SL93 (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is the guideline at WP:NBAND about how a band may be notable if it contains members from other notable bands, but that's too much of a stretch for this act. They are only visible in the usual streaming and social media sources, and I can find no reliable reviews of their album. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 16:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for music Such-change47 (talk) 10:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.