Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBC Two 1991-2001 idents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

BBC Two 1991-2001 idents
The result was Relist at Proposed mergers. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The content of this article could be condensed into the BBC Two and History of BBC television idents articles. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Then withdraw your nomination, be bold and do so. AfD is not the venue to petition for content merges. TomPointTwo (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as separate article, don't merge. For similar reasons to those already expressed in existing discussions at Talk:History of BBC television idents, if anything a more natural merge target, where consensus has already rejected merger.  The content in this article is of value, and should not be lost to Wikipedia.  The subject deserves (and gets) a short summary in BBC Two and in History of BBC television idents, but the more complete discussion we currently give sits better in its own article. Jheald (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge in History of BBC television idents. This isn't about deleting content but creating more of a relevant summary. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If you don't want the content deleted then withdraw this (and the other) nomination(s) and go ahead and merge the material. If there is opposition to it on the article space then work it out on the relevant article's discussion pages. TomPointTwo (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

C:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.''