Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBS University of Technology and Skill Development, Khairpur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES has been stricken as WP:ANA per Village pump (policy). As the RfC was closed while this discussion was in progress, I believe a WP:SOFTDELETE close is proper in this case. Kurykh (talk) 04:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

BBS University of Technology and Skill Development, Khairpur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally proposed this article for PROD when first created but was contested with no reason provided. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. Class 455 ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  01:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Class 455  ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  01:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Degree granting institution set up by a parliamentary act and functioning currently. Lourdes  06:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Those are mainly notices just saying that the school is functioning which doesn't make it pass NSCHOOL, there isnt very much coverage which indicates the subject is notable. Class 455  ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  12:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:NSCHOOL: "(But see also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, especially for universities.)"
 * WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists."... Lourdes  16:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. As cited by, "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists." — Yashtalk stalk 08:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What kind of sources would you suggest using to build this article? It's a new university so surely the sources should not be far off, no? "WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES" is currently the subject of an RfC so I don't find it particularly convincing on its own here. czar  02:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only arguments I see here are appeals to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.  I always find these sorts of arguments circular; we should keep X because we always have usually kept X in the past. , you mention an RfC, but I can't find it.  Could you please provide a link to it?  Based on my own searches, I'm not seeing the kind of sources we need to do anything other than verify that a bill was passed.  There is a website for a school called BENAZIR BHUTTO SHAHEED UNIVERSITY LYARI, which has very little real information.  So little, in fact, that I'm not even sure it's for the same school as the subject of this article.  So, I'm not even sure this passes WP:V.  If this school really does exist, there should be some third-party sources beyond routine reports of a bill being passed to create it.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * : Village pump (policy) czar  14:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * hello. There are two sources which might interest you. Thanks. Lourdes  02:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Good faith relisting

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nördic   Nightfury  14:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.