Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCA Illustrated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Not notable. Malinaccier (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

BCA Illustrated

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable website SGGH speak! 13:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless sourcing added to show why this is more notable than other building code websites.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 13:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable commercial subscription website with no showing of either notability or broad appeal to the general public. The building code itself is probably worthy of an article; not this online edition.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete utterly non-notable. Could easily have been speedied as A7 web content. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.