Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCGsearch.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Personally, I would say that the article should simply be deleted, but there is consensus to merge, and my task as an administrator is to reflect that consensus, not impose my own view. I shall redirect the article, and leave it to one or more of the editors who argued for merging to decide exactly what content should be merged. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

BCGsearch.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There's a fair bit of contentious content here, to be sure, but I'm not seeing sourcing which meets WP:CORPDEPTH. I am open to appropriate alternatives to deletion, but in any case, I think the right outcome here is likely to be improved by a community discussion. joe deckertalk 03:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move material to the appropriate place (possibly Cyber defamation law) to describe this dispute (more RS: [] ).   The lawsuit appears to be notable, but probably not the two parties to the lawsuit nor the entity where it happened (BCG Search) appear to have notability outside the dispute.  --David Tornheim (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Move/selective merge?
 * Merge dispute information to Cyber defamation law as per above and Keep rest as per WP:UNDUE.  There are WP:RS for the search firm doing search firmy-type things:,  and for the firm's owner firmly practicing pedal-oral implantation multiple times.  These Above the Law mentions are not flattering, but AtL is a WP:RS in legal news and as such does contribute to WP:GNG notability.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.