Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCOS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

BCOS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product. This Wikipedia article is the only result in a google search for "biodynamic cyclone organic stimulator". WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as either the most non-notable thing I've ever seen or, more probably, falling under WP:HOAX. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatantly and patently non-notable. GABHello! 21:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not a hoax, it's just describing a piece of specialized equipment, apparently a stirring machine, used by some farms. It is absolutely positively not notable outside the experts who use this equipment. Think how many millions of pieces of specialized equipment across thousands of professions that must exist in the world—and those don't need articles either. The overview article biodynamic farming is certainly notable, but nothing more granular than that is needed here. Prhartcom (talk) 22:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficiently notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as nothing for at least general notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.