Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BC Cascadia Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cascadia (independence movement). (non-admin closure) buidhe 01:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

BC Cascadia Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It exists, but no indication of how it meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete no significant coverage for apparent joke party. Two losing candidates in one election is not notability and their website is dead already. Reywas92Talk 22:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Consider Redirect to to Cascadia (independence movement) or keeping as a Stub. The movement is real if small. It has advocates in British Columbia Canada. Given the state of politics today a stub is warranted at best and a redirect at worst. Philoserf (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think there's even enough reliable data for a redirect. There is no evidence of secondary sources covering this party in more than one sentence. Protean Self (talk) 00:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - It is a sincere political party. If there is not sufficient references for its own article, it is significant enough to note in Cascadia (independence movement) which I have done here based on the references provided. maclean (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.