Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCoD 04

BCoD 04
BCoD 04 was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

If there's anything less notable than a graphic that temporarily appeared on a web page please let me know. --LeeHunter 17:16, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is completely unnecessary information. It's silly to report each and every website glitch.--Deadworm222 15:09, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This may even be a gloat by the hacker themselves. I'm tempted to speedy it on the grounds that the author has twice now deleted speedy tags, but not very... policies are important. Andrewa 17:47, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Extremely dumb. Either someone was in an awful hurry to write it up, or someone knew it was going to happen.  In either case, there is 0 encyclopedic content here.  Geogre 17:48, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Actually, I tried to speedy it an hour or two before it appeared here. Perhaps the author deleted the speedy tag, or the admin thought it wasn't eligible.   --BM 18:41, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does appear that the author removed the speedy tag that I added.  I'm re-adding it, but leaving this here also, in case it is removed again. --BM 18:44, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * DELETE! It was a glitch. That's not worth an entry.
 * I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with the author on this one: Not a Candidate for Speedy Deletion. Delete though. --fvw *  18:52, 2004 Dec 26 (UTC)
 * Comment: But the point was I don't think the author should be the one to remove the speedy tag. No change of vote. Andrewa 19:56, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg | Talk 23:05, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 01:44, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --AlainV 03:58, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete.Mikkalai 04:05, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * PLEASE DELETE This is a waste of space.
 * Sorry. I'm the author and I deleted the Speedy Entry thing because I didnt know what it was. I'll leave it up for now on. Sorry, again.
 * Please sign your posts here, user:Mathwizxp?. Andrewa 12:23, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete: Some people may be interested in this information. Perhaps it could be relocated to the general Harry Potter/ JK Rowling articles?


 * Don't Delete: Come on, this is awesome.
 * Don't Delete: This rocks the house, people! Us nerds live uff this kind off stuff!

Don't Delete: I'm a member of the BCOD. I re-did the entry on there. It's a little more informative, but not much. But still, I find that it is an important entry.
 * Please sign your posts, User:141.152.27.231. But a member of what? This doesn't seem to match the article we're discussing. Andrewa 12:23, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete


 * Don't Delete: I believe the fact that it involves so many people makes it worth the page. Of course a better, encyclopedic description would be more appropriate.


 * Delete. RW 04:56, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.