Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDA Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

BDA Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 27.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: A series of August 2015 edits by a WP:COI editor User:Bdallc left the article with primary sources and removed various listed awards. Viewing this earlier version may be more appropriate to assess whether there is sufficient notability. AllyD (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- self-sourced / weakly sourced corporate spam and just a firm going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Just corporate Spam. do not adhere standards set by Wikipedia. Light2021 (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.