Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  05:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

BDNA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for company of marginal notability by now banned promotional editor. The awards are minor; the references are PR; and nothing else can be expected, for the accomplishments are fundamentally insufficient for notability.  DGG ( talk ) 08:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  → Call me  Hahc  21  04:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There is a lack of significant coverage about this company in reliable, independent sources as needed to establish notability. Possibly, their Technopedia product is notable, but I don't think the company is.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  05:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. I found only routine coverage found in a search. --MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.