Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BEARcade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to ASUC. Deathphoenix ʕ 06:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

BEARcade
Hard to tell if this is notable, at least enough to be included on Wikipedia. No vote on my part, just trying to see what others think. CrypticBacon 06:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Dominic Nguyen lamented its closing in an editorial on the Megatokyo site, and aside from that I've heard of it several times over from dozens of individuals.  On the other hand, it could seem very much like arcadecruft, so I can certainly understand that if it goes.--み使い Mitsukai 06:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment from nom. Seems to fail notability guidlines for companies.  "Unofficial" vote for delete. --CrypticBacon 09:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to ASUC. (Bearcade itself is not a corporation.  ASUC is a notable student government which ran Bearcade.) —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-26 10:10Z 
 * Strong Delete. it's not notable. (I'm a Cal student and I know what this is.) if this is notable, then every single pizza parlor, bowling alley, and shopping mall arcade store deserves an article.--Jiang 11:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * merge and redirect to ASUC -- Astrokey44 |talk 15:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jiang. Pepsidrinka 19:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per User:Quarl. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Quarl Jporcaro 21:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Quarl -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall 22:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking notability, importance, and context. -- Krash (Talk) 14:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.