Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BEAST!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – --Cel e stianpower háblame 20:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

BEAST!
Neologism. Delete. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Second. Delete. Freshgavin 00:59, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete per nom 01:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original Research. By the way, Ms. Brown may be disappointed to find that the term predates her friends; it appears in the King James version. D. G. 02:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Rjayres 04:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Bjelleklang -  talk 08:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. KHM03 12:59, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism. --Optichan 16:34, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable and poorly written. -Haon 21:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Non-notable --Amxitsa 22:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obviously --Irishpunktom\talk 22:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yawn --Ewok Slayer 01:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.