Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BFE

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:34, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

BFE
non-encyclopedic DCEdwards1966 03:14, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Hoary 03:39, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. To me it looks like a very bad hoax. Mgm|(talk) 09:05, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary. Real term, especially in the military.  RickK 22:20, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with Wiktionary's policy on slang, or i'd also reccomend a move, but i am also familiar with the term. See http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=BFE --foobaz&middot;&#9998; 23:15, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, badly written, hardly any content, dictionary definition. Megan1967 01:14, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this vandalism. --Deathphoenix 03:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. It's a real term, so this isn't vandalism, however unencyclopedic it might be. Szyslak 05:43, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Vandalism, plain and simple. Carrp 00:06, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * MERGE! to List of U.S. Army acronyms and expressions as it seems to have its origin there, it is at least common in all branches of service, though, and has a proper home and context there. ...on it's own it seems anti-Egypt 'pejoration'. Pedant 22:27, 2005 Jan 12 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.