Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BFG 9000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

BFG 9000

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Closest thing to notability is placement on completely arbitrary "best weapon EVAR" lists. No out-of-universe reactions besides that. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Look at the news results, the thing has been constantly referenced from 1994 to the present. UGO & IGN are about as reliable as one can get when it comes to video games sources (I don't count that as a notable "award," I count it as a reliable critical reaction).  Wickedjacob (talk) 04:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per nom. Fictional references abound, real world references are evident--it's clear that the fictional element transcends the game from which it originated. Jclemens (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - per above comment, as well as the fact the it was heavily involved in Doom (movie). Skullbird11 (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If real world sources exist, add them. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Given the number of sources available in the News and Books links, you're certainly welcome to, as well. Of course, per WP:BEFORE, a reasonable argument could be made that it's your obligation, as nominator, to do so... Jclemens (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Suggestion - The Doom weapons in general have a plethora of hits in Google Books and Scholar. I suggest a split-off article for Weapons in Doom, and redirect BFG 9000 there. That would be my preference. However, a separate BFG 9000 article is feasible: Example source: Marasmusine (talk) 10:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WickedJacob. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.