Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIBLETIME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

BIBLETIME

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:OR as reference is written by article author. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  21:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I would have just put this up for speedy deletion, it is completely incoherent and unreferenced and unstructured. Clearly made up by author.-- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 15:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced, incoherent essay per WP:NOR and WP:NOTESSAY: reads like a polite version of the Time Cube guy. Includes linkspam to article creator's self-published book on Amazon, which I've left in place for context to other editors considering this AFD. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant or notable coverage about this, multiple searches found absolutely nothing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.