Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIF spam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

BIF spam
This article is about a non-notable term that some guy "Curtis H." made up. This term is not used by people in the anti-spam field. The article has nothing useful to say which is not already said in our many other articles pertaining to email spam. It seems to exist solely to lend legitimacy to this one person's made-up word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fubar Obfusco (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nominator. The only other sites that contain this term are Wikipedia mirrors, or are cases of incidental usage. Non-notable neologism.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  05:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete  protologism. Google can't find anyone using the terms "BIF spam" or "getting BIFed". Weregerbil 10:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipediaspamcruftneologism. NN, too. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete  protologism. incog 21:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.