Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIG Television Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

BIG Television Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Award show that I'm having problems finding notability for at all! Wgolf (talk) 15:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Here are your sources:
 * https://in.movies.yahoo.com/news/reliance-broadcast-announces-big-television-awards-131439042.html
 * http://www.bollywoodtrade.com/trade-news/reliance-broadcast-network-limited-announces-big-television-awards/3FB10636-1825-44F7-9A02-06EDEB67DE78/index.htm
 * http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Big-stars-entering-awards-race/articleshow/17613518.cms
 * http://www.eventfaqs.com/news/ef-01179/Cineyug-and-Reliance-manage-th-1310927903804.html#.VTfOz_bcjF0
 * There are probably more in Hindi/Telugu/Urdu/etc. sources. 103.7.250.251 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – Another source search below. North America1000 18:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Source examples include, , , . North America1000 18:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Now the article meets WP:GNG. Before Wgolf had nominated the article for deletion, the article was meeting deletion policy. But now after nomination, someone has added sources to the article, and I've also checked that the sources are reliable. So, now the article can exist on Wikipedia. ARegards,  Kunal For  You 📝☎️ 15:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – Note that the absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable. Topic notability is based upon source availability, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. North America1000 23:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Apparently, a WP:BEFORE failure. Cavarrone 07:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn-and for the record I actually did look up before I even asked a user from India about this and they couldn't even find anything about it! (I was getting tons of other stuff for big award show) Wgolf (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.