Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIHF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. It's snowing. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

BIHF

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NEOLOGISM/WP:NFT. No reliable, independent, third party sources. A google search of the acronym turns up nothing, and something else already takes the acronymn (probably an neologism also), which is why a redirect is not appropriate. (ex. see ) &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  19:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Send to urban dictionary! Francium12 (talk) 19:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete-Definite sent to urban dictionary]-- SKATER  Speak. 19:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 20:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, made-up neologism. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete...do I even need to tell you why!?!? KMFDM FAN  (talk!) 20:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Well the PROD was removed which is why I brought this to AfD. There needs to be a speedy for NEOLOGISMS. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  21:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, since we can't transwiki to the urban dictionary. WP:NEO. WP:MADEUP. I think it's snowing already. Tim Song (talk) 00:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.