Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIIAB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus. (Actually, only three people have commented, so that's consensus, isn't it? :) Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

BIIAB

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

not notable, fails WP:ORG Carabinieri 19:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick Google says it doesn't fail WP:ORG. CiaranG 23:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * conditional keep and holdon If the legal requirement for certification can be sourced, then this is clearly notable. They appear to be an important regulatory and industry body.  I'm looking for sources right now, so if you can bear with me a bit I can probably improve the article. Wintermut3 19:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if it can be sourced and clean up. The article wording at the moment implies more than the BIIAB is. It is not a regulatory body, it offers training (along with many others) to meet the regulations. Nuttah68 17:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nuttah68, I've made a cleanup pass to clarify that it's only one body offering liscensing, but it seems that they do do a fair share of the governmental training for certain required certifications. I'd compare it to ServSafe in the US, yes there are other food safety training programs availible, but ServSafe is definately the primary certification I've ever encountered (though that might be geographical).  As such I still think it's probably notable. Wintermut3 20:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.