Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BILLIONAIRES ROW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

BILLIONAIRES ROW

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm just seeing press releases and trivial mentions in RS, showing an apparent lack of notability. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Keep The newslinks used in the article has no Pless release stuff and it has article from The Drinks Business (magazine) a monthly international B2B magazine and website published by Union Press having around 500000 readers featuring the Billionaires Row Champagne also article from campdenfb featuring Billionaires Row Champagne. It has 2 news links from America's most prominent news paper Newyork times, and the mentions from People magazine and famous extratv. So there is enough and more notability. Always :) 17:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwayssmileguys (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - most of the sources are press releases (including the Drinks Business link) and those that aren't are extremely trivial mentions (three different articles about a party where this champagne brand is mentioned...), plus one review on a wine blog. Nothing that indicates any kind of notability for the brand name. --bonadea contributions talk 21:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment May i know what actually you meant by PRESS RELEASE, according to my understanding the links provided in the article has nothing to do with press releases. Kindly clarify ! where in the "Drinks Business" article and Newyork times article and other prominent articles do you find it as press release ? Please explain and give clarity when you say it is a press release !

Always :) 08:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * A press release is a statement written by a company (or an agent, or a marketing firm, or similar) in order to promote something or somebody. The statement is then sent to various media - hence the name "press release". It is fairly easy to spot a press release from the writing style, and it often includes direct quotes. Learning to recognise them is largely a matter of experience, but when you see a short notice like the one here which reads as if it was published by the company itself, it is often a good idea to look further (because press releases are usually published in more than one place. Sometimes a publication rewrites it slightly or cuts it down, but it's still a PR even if a few words might have been changed or omitted.) The original press release reprinted in The Drinks Business can be found here. --bonadea contributions talk 15:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment new link from lemillebolleblog.it added. Always :) 11:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwayssmileguys (talk • contribs)


 * Delete Fails notability standards for companies. While the New York Times is generally held to be a reliable source, the champagne and its producer is only mentioned in passing. Searches in gNews & gBooks turn up nothing. The majority of the citations in the article are blogs, which are generally not accepted as reliable sources. Perhaps this is just too new a thing to have become notable. Contrast, for example, this champagne with Veuve Clicquot, Moët or even Freixenet, if we are staying with the bubbly. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 22:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per others, no indepth coverage in reliable secondary sources. Citobun (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.