Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJHS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete. Robdurbar 16:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

BJHS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Currently undergoing Speedy delete. I'm contesting this, per page at http://www.district87.org/bjhs/ although I am not advocating either position. Sigma 7 20:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete. as non-notable nonsense. The citation mentioned above is also not considered a reliable source. The author's original disclaimer of the article's falseness should justify a deletion or a complete rewrite with citations for all facts. 24fan24 (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment CSD doesn't apply to hoax articles; precedent says all schools are notable, so CSD-A7 doesn't apply; it isn't patent nonsense so it isn't CSD-G1. I've removed the speedy tag on that basis. 〈 RED VEЯS 〉 21:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: While the hompepage of the school isn't a reliable source for citation, it is reliable enough to prove it's existance (and thus can be used as an external link when notability can be established.) If there is incorrect content within the article, then it can be stripped out (even if it means taking out large sections.) --Sigma 7 13:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - or someone can try to figure out what's true and what's not in the article and move it to Bloomington Junior High School or somesuch.  *Mishatx* -  In \ Out   21:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that if kept it must be moved. --24fan24 (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy delete Agreed that speedy doesnt cover hoaxes, but it does cover nonsense. An article beginning "BJHS was founded in 1742 During the First Inner-City war of Bloomington, Illinois. " is nonsense. It does not take exposure to many different people to agree that it didn't happen.DGG 05:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD G3 DGG's reason makes it obvious that this page is vandalism. Jesse Viviano 16:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.