Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJP Mahila Morcha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 13:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

BJP Mahila Morcha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources are routine coverages. Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisted per Deletion review/Log/2020 February 20, please see there for potentially relevant information.
 * Delete as it fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset of a political party is not independently notable. Seems to have been created with the sole purpose to promote its office bearers.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  05:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:11, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The concern is lack of sources that prove independent notability. This article above is entirely based on the org's Press release and doesn't even talk about the Org, quite far from passing WP:ORGCRIT. -- ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  08:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep No evidence of BEFORE. AfD is not cleanup.--Goldsztajn (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * AfD is not just posting a vote. Mahila Morcha will fail per WP:BRANCH.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 01:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No evidence of any BEFORE. BRANCH provides clear guidance on when separate articles are appropriate; moreover, BRANCH does not trump GNG/ORG. Simple, reasonable search reveals multiple RS.


 * Keep Undoubtedly notable. The nominator should try other options before afd. Shyamsunder (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Goldsztajn which I couldn't have put better. The DRV should be read as suggested by the relisting admin.  The was a question of whether this should be redirect/merge prior to a split out however I strongly reject that as in my opinion it would be difficult to do without undue weight in a high importance target article.  The article has been developed slightly since that suggestion, it needs more but is really beyond my skill or resources to go farther myself.  I remain reasonably convinced no evidence of alternatives to deletion were considered in this nomination by failure to pre-tag the article with notability issues for a reasonable period and failure to present evidence that options such as redirect had been considered.  Additionally care should be taken with articles that are claimed to be of Mid/High Importance though I would have been reluctant to perhaps even go as far as Mid-importance myself.  That said the state of the article was lamentably poor; it still remains currently below start. But AfD is not cleanup and the idea is we try to grow the encylopedia.Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)  The result of Articles for deletion/All India Mahila Congress should also be noted for community consistency.Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep the women's wing of the world's largest political party certainly passes the WP:GNG criteria. Similar articles exist, for example, see Conservative Women's Organisation. --RaviC (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.