Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BKV Advertising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 16:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

BKV Advertising

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional, with no real sources for notability  DGG ( talk ) 01:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Aside from the coverage referenced in the article, which is the local coverage one would expect of any such firm, plus various routine announcements via searches, I did find a Design Week article (now included as a reference). It frames a discussion topic with this firm's material, which is possibly not enough to be about the firm itself though. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - 3 of the 4 Google News searches I performed, 1, 2 and 3, all provided PR pieces, republished PR or bizjournals.com (latter tends not to be the best source sometimes). No major or in-depth coverage. I will say that some links simply say BKV so they may be referring to another person/company but either way, not notable. A search at major newspaper Kansas City Star did not provide anything so obviously they're a small company and use more bizjournals and PR than actual news coverage. No prejudice towards a future article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:47, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not pass Notability (organizations and companies). Also, wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. -   t  u coxn \ talk 23:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.