Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLK 55


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

BLK 55

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is made by the subject related (autobiography). Its log before changing name this and this MRZQ (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Atlantic306 (talk)
 * Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Charitably it is too soon for an article on this rapper because so far he is in purely self-promotional mode. All that can be found are the typical streaming and social media sites where anyone can upload their own stuff. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON as there are no albums yet and there is a lack of reliable sources coverage. For example there is no entry for him at AllMusic, imv
 * I know this belongs in a different spot. But since you brought it up, I thought I would toss this out there. We really need to stop considering AllMusic as a reliable source. It may be a decent source for track names and times. But for anything else, there are far too many errors and omissions to be considered reliable. Additionally, the way AllMusic gets its data makes it less than reliable, solely because it only adds what people submit to it. Furthermore, once they put the data up, they allow user edits. It may not be as fluid as Wikipedia, but everything is editable.2601:983:827F:6B20:9D38:4027:AF81:D46E (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. It was once a terrific source when it was print only with dedicated editorial staff with oversight. For 5 or 10 years it has evolved in it's quest to meet its stated mission of being an online database/resource for all music that is sold anywhere. Strange thing, though, they still maintain editorial oversight for select entries, so it's really hard to discern between the good and the bad sometimes. I advocate for the default being unreliable unless the specific exceptions can be cited. However, AfD discussions among other editors take the opposite view. And Their's are the official policy currently in effect. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete 2601:983:827F:6B20:9D38:4027:AF81:D46E (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.