Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLOC Hotels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

BLOC Hotels

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. The Guardian source is good, but I think that's the only coverage in a high quality source that this chain of hotels has received. Article claims that the NYT have covered it, but I can't find any evidence to support this. Almost certainly created by a paid editor: Sockpuppet_investigations/TimeQueen32/Archive. SmartSE (talk) 23:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. The NYT has a two-sentence mini-review of the Birmingham hotel, and at least one photo, at the end of a "36 Hours" feature about the city dated 29 January 2012.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment -- I am always suspicious of any article that says "best known for", which often means "not realy known at all. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  → Call me  Hahc  21  05:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.