Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLTC Research

BLTC Research was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Not that there's a theme here or anything. If David Pearce gets vfd'd, his non-profit ought to get put up for a vote as well. --DMG413 15:37, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Considering the Google Bombing suggested earlier, I'm going to say weak delete unless someone can prove that there is actually enough material to create an encyclopedic verifiable article. &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  18:06, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete: Again, the burden of proof is on the article: it has a duty of showing notability, relevance, and NPOV.  It isn't "keep unless it shows itself to be horrible," at least in my opinion.  In this case, the article gives us no reason to believe this non-profit is anything but a non-profit.  When they succeed in eliminating the "chemical substrate of suffering in all mankind," they'll be really significant.  Geogre 19:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:54, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is beginning to taste a lot like spam, and I don't like spam. Pedant 08:19, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.