Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMI Lehman Engel Musical Theatre Workshop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ——Serial Number 54129 11:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__

BMI Lehman Engel Musical Theatre Workshop

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article was merged to Broadcast Music, Inc., but it does not have that enough sources to establish notability. A tag was placed three days ago but no new sourcing was introduced. Toadette Edit! 18:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. This is an important musical theatre institution, numerous sources about which are easily found on Google as well as pre-internet sources.  It already had plenty of good sources, and I added a couple more. This article should be greatly expanded. I think the nominator should do a Google news search and withdraw this AfD. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly notable, given the number, range and weight of sources (the retrospective on its fortieth anniversary in the industry magazine Backstage should be enough od an indication on its own really, but there are numerous others). - SchroCat (talk) 05:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep and close per WP:SNOW. Clearly a notable organization with lots of WP:SIGCOV across several decades in a wide range of sources. It even gets 47 hits in google scholar which shows there is coverage in academic publications as well as in the many newspaper and magazines used as sources in the article already. This was not a well thought through nomination.4meter4 (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.