Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNR Metal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Ezeu 00:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

BNR Metal
Owner-operated website that fails WP:V and WP:WEB. Useful for metal fans but not sure it belongs on WP.  Dei zio  talk 10:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The site is very well-known within the metal scene and even beats Wikipedia on Google results pretty often, but it doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB. Alexa rank: 86,046. Prolog 12:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Anomo 07:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep--this site is very well known and gets a lot of traffic. Plus it is a great resource.  --Eastlaw 23:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:WEB, nn in scope of human knowledge, and who cares if it's a great resource, WP is not a directory. Tony fanta 03:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Question : what makes Encyclopaedia Metallum worthy of an article and not BNR? Iron C hris |  (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Articles are judged against the relevant guidelines & policies, not other articles.  Dei zio  talk 23:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I wasn't trying to judge the article, I was trying to understand what the guidelines & policies say about web pages that makes Encyclopaedia Metallum notable and not BNR. It wasn't a rhetoric question and I wasn't implying that if Encyclopaedia Metallum is notable, then BNR is, nor that if BNR isn't then E.M. isn't either. Iron C hris |  (talk) 04:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. Well, EM have been covered in a published magazine, have 80,000 members and 40,000 bands. Their Alexa traffic rank is also pretty good, 4,373. Prolog 10:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.