Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOD (consulting firm)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

BOD (consulting firm)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP criteria requires in-depth "Independent Content" about the *company*. Most of the references rely on PR or on awards won by projects the company may have contributed to. This is insufficient to meet the criteria and I am unable to locate any references that do.  HighKing++ 13:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies.  HighKing++ 13:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Delhi.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. The big interview in The Economic Times seems to be the most promising but is not independent. Overall, feels run of the mill for a company, but I'm not familiar enough with the topic to be sure.&mdash;siro&chi;o 20:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's worth keeping and refining--DH22 Mim (talk) 12:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Coverage lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Economic Times article exhibited churnalism characteristics. Numerous "says Manocha." doesn't imply notability due to significant quotation. It implies lack of independent secondary coverage. Graywalls (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as another non-notable (and a bit of promo-style) org page. Deckkohl (talk) 17:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.