Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOLDfest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

BOLDfest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

don't see that this meets WP:NEVENT, as well as WP:GNG Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Oppose There are three reliable source references already on the article, from Xtra, and I was able to find a fourth very easily via Google, from the Georgia Straight. Three RS is my personal rule of thumb for satisfying the "multiple" criterion in WP:GNG, and with four (and perhaps others to be found) it's a fairly straightforward keep, for me. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've also notified WikiProject LGBT studies/LGBT in Canada work group. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Shawn in Montreal. Earflaps (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Shawn in Montreal. The article is fairly well-sourced and is clearly notable, even though I will admit that it does need to be better integrated into the encyclopedia (which the maintenance tags already mention). BenLinus  1214 talk 22:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep (Disclaimer: I have a bias here, as I assisted at the editathon where this article was created) This is borderline in terms of notability, but just on the right side of the border, IMO. We have significant coverage, albeit local.  The Interior  (Talk) 23:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.