Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BRAJ PRADESH .


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

BRAJ PRADESH.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page is about a proposed state. The only information I could find was a couple news articles from 2009 indicating that there was some support for the creation of such a state. Until this becomes a reall state, or at least is seriously considered by officials of the country, I think this should be deleted per WP:CRYSTAL Millermk90 (talk) 09:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to Harit Pradesh, which is about the same proposed state as this article. "Harit Pradesh (Hindi: हरित प्रदेश, Urdu: ہرِت پردیش) is a proposed new state of India comprising the western parts of Uttar Pradesh state. Braj Pradesh (ब्रज प्रदेश) and Pashchim Pradesh (पश्चिम प्रदेश) are alternative names that have been proposed..." Logan Talk Contributions 12:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment This article has an extra space and period in the title, as well as being in all caps. It should not be a rediriect (perhaps the article without the period could be though. Whether or not the content should be moved is really what's up for debate, due to the problems with the article's title. Millermk90 (talk) 05:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Logan Talk Contributions 12:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

This is the best article on the subject. The other articles which have been accepted by you on this subject are not complete.

This article gives the glimpse of the region in a nutshell.Therefore I request U to consider and accept the article "BRAJ PRADESH." .

G.S.RANA — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSR MRT (talk • contribs) 02:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Difficult read due to formatting and boldface emphasis of key names surrounding this proposed state, but that's an aside and has nothing to do with my !vote.  As a proposed state, at this point, the article falls afoul of WP:CRYSTAL.  It will only pass our notability guidelines if there is either conflict that arises as a result of this formation regardless of successful formation, or if it actually forms.  Aside from that, based on User:GSR MRT's post, I can only presume the potential of conflict of interest. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.