Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BRC Imagination Arts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  A  Train ''talk 08:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

BRC Imagination Arts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete Blatant promotionalism. Fails WP:SPIP. Has been tagged since Jan 2014 for reading like an advertisement and it appears to have only gotten worse since then. References mainly fail WP:ORGIND as they're advertorials or interviews or use extensive quotations from company sources. -- HighKing ++ 14:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. There's a carpet-bomb of references, so at first glance this looks like it passes WP:CORPDEPTH.  But, as I started to review the references in the article, it became obvious that this was not the case.  I read three that looked particularly promissing, from the NY Times, Time, and The LA Times.  Unfortunately, all of them turned out to be about projects the firm had been involved in, and only mentioned the firm itself in passing.  To meet WP:CORPDEPTH, we need sources which talk about the company itself, not just mention it as being involved in certain projects, when it's the project which is what's really notable.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the GNG and CORPdepth as well. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  14:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - lots of passing mentions, but can't find in-depth coverage. Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel 5969  TT me 21:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.