Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BROADCASTING OF TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleting of article. --Core desat 04:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

BROADCASTING OF TV

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Also nominating the duplicate article

These articles are unnecessary, low quality forks of Television, Broadcasting, Radio, and other material treated in much higher quality articles. John254 17:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETING OF ARTICLE. Both are low-quality dupes. humblefool&reg; 17:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per both of you.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Broadcasting, where Television broadcasting redirects to. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 21:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I disagree with a redirect. The redirect would not normally be created, so why do it just because these useless articles were? J Milburn 22:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nobody is going to use such a redirect. Fee Fi Foe Fum 23:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. Utter piffle. THE KING 09:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect both. -- Whpq 17:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no redirects per J Milburn. "Broadcasting of TV" is certainly not a likely search term. Doctorfluffy —Preceding comment was added at 07:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - and all capitals? Agree with nom. Think outside the box 14:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.