Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BSCW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

BSCW
Delete: not notable (see WP:CORP) Batsonjay 18:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - per norm, did not meet WP:CORP. --Hurricane111 18:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 21:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as somewhat notable groupware software package from Fraunhofer Society (which is extremely notable and not a corporation). German version of article has been around since 2004-03-14 .  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 22:10Z 


 * I question the good faith or neutrality of the nominator. User:Batsonjay founded a company for competing software, Plum Canary, whose articles were deleted on 2005-09-03 and 2005-09-12 (see AFD/Chirp software, AFD/Plum Canary), and has been mass-nominating competing groupware software for deletion.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 22:44Z 
 * Keep per above. -- JJay 02:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sour grapes? Maybe. But his articles don't belong here either. -- Krash 16:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I would say speedy keep as bad faith nomination, but it doesn't qualify. I don't see any reason to delete this, keep. Stifle 01:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.