Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BS 7799


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. RL0919 (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

BS 7799

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and United Kingdom.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not a great article, but seems to be notable. Some sources that talk about it at varying degrees of depth (mostly academic):      .  Popo Dameron  ⁠ talk  20:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep -- sources found by Explicit are sufficient to meet the GNG. Central and Adams (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per new sources. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.