Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BS 7925-2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Duplicate nomination to Articles for deletion/BS 7925-1. ansh 666 05:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

BS_7925-2
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Superceded Andrew D Banks (talk) 06:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

I propose that this BS 7925-2 stub-page be deleted, with a redirection to ISO/IEC 29119.
 * Merger proposal

This BS 7925-2 article has very limited content, and this standard has now been superseded by ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-4 - so what little is here, is obsolete anyway!

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:



Note: I posted this on the Talk Page of the article on 13 October 2017, with no response (for or against!)

Andrew D Banks (talk) 10:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 06:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * delete Incredibly scanty hits suggest that nobody ever cared. Mangoe (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 14:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * merge + redirect per, though I would suggest simply editing the pages to a redirect to retain contributor history rather than deleting. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigmamsg 19:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Proposal In the interests of sanity can all further discussion take place on Articles for deletion/BS 7925-1 and whatever is decided for that goes for this also. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.