Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUFF (Malmö Film Festival)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus below indicates that the topic meets notability guidelines. (Non-admin closure). Till 10:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

BUFF (Malmö Film Festival)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Of no importance. Andrei S (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Update: Does not seem to fully satisfy: WP:INDEPTH as it seems to be more like routine reporting in most press articles and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE as the news coverage seems to come and go although the festival has been going on for 23 years according to some of the resources below. Andrei S (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Gets annual press coverage Mentioned in many guidebooks e.g. and lots of official government sources, filmmaking reference works (Adam Langer, "The film festival guide"), etc.  "Of no importance" is not a reason for deletion. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - if Colapeninsula hasn't already found more than enough evidence, the Swedish national daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter covered Buff on 15 March 2011 (brief mention) and 18 March 2008 (Pia Huss). The other major paper, Svenska Dagbladet, has 18 March 2011 (Malena Janson) and other mentions (noticeably, the mentions assume readers already know all about Buff). It's a notable film festival. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per above presentation of references. __meco (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep – The topic passes WP:GNG:
 * Kårsta.JPG
 * Både galakänsla och övergivna barn - Nöje - Skånskan.se
 * BUFF slår upp portarna - Lokaltidningen
 * Dags för Buff igen - Lokaltidningen
 * BUFF inleder med Kenny - Lokaltidningen
 * Åtta filmer tävlar om Svenska kyrkans ungdomsfilmpris - Svenska kyrkan - Om oss
 * Blå Malmöfilm på Buff - Nöje - Kristianstadsbladet - Nyheter dygnet runt
 * Buff-pris till kortfilmsduo - DN.SE
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 21:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * SNOW Keep per meeting WP:GNG. And I am unimpressed with the deletion rationale "Of no importance", as it feels too much of personal opinion, and is not one of the policy or guideline arguments preferred by WP:DEL. While it may indeed by "of no importance" to the nominator, notable to Sweden, as shown, is perfectly fine for en.Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.