Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUNT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD blatant hoax JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

BUNT

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Co-nominating article about the band's album for deletion

I had declined the speedy delete on this article because it made assertions of notability. However, having been able to check out their "official website", (which I could not do from work as my office blocks webs.com sites) it appears the band is a bunch of tweens and teens; it is unlikely they are the success they claim to be. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax. While there may be a band calling themselves that, nobody can sell 3 million copies without the media noticing, especially as that would have meant about half the total population of Serbia would have bought it. WP:BULLOCKS. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G3. I agree, it looks like a hoax. No real mention of it anywhere, and a band that famous would definitely have third-party sources. Plus the "album art" or whatever that image seems to be was obviously created with Picnik or a similar service, which is highly unlikely for a band that claims to be of that caliber. I put a speedy delete tag on the image, but will refrain from doing anything to the article until consensus is determined... GorillaWarfare  talk 13:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.